Epstein Secrets

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM related. For the Daskal case I EFTA00173591 completed a 69-page review. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of

on-CSAM related. For the Daskal case I EFTA00173591 completed a 69-page review. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it was CSAM For the Darnel Feagins case I was splitting the work. I did not do CSAM-related work from home. I did not take

olution in house. We also asked if OTD would work with the ApostleX company to develop the ApostleX product. We learned there was a product called Eagle Claw available which I believe should be taken off the approved list of tools to use. There was only one guy at the EFTA00173623 time working on Eagle

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but EFTA001735

l non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but EFTA00173526 none of it was CSAM; rather it was data to prove he and the victim of the investigation were together in various loc

olution in house. We also asked if OTD would work with the ApostleX company to develop the ApostleX product. We learned there was a product called Eagle Claw available which I believe is so bad that it should be taken off the approved list of tools to use. There was only one guy at the time working on Ea

l non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it was CSAM; rather it was data to prove he and the victim of the investigation were together in various locations and cer

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it

olution in house. We also asked if OTD would work with the ApostleX company to develop the ApostleX product. We learned there was a product called Eagle Claw available which I believe is so bad that it should be taken off the approved list of tools to use. There was only one guy at the time working on Ea