Epstein Secrets

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM related. For the Daskal case I EFTA00173591 completed a 69-page review. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of

on-CSAM related. For the Daskal case I EFTA00173591 completed a 69-page review. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it was CSAM For the Darnel Feagins case I was splitting the work. I did not do CSAM-related work from home. I did not take

t in our Intel supervisors. We wanted to make the product useful, not only to us, but to other people throughout the Bureau as well. We brought in CHS Coordinators, people from Intel, and people from the VC program. We did not want to think singularly about our violation. It is required by FBI policy that we

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but EFTA001735

l non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but EFTA00173526 none of it was CSAM; rather it was data to prove he and the victim of the investigation were together in various loc

t in our Intel supervisors. We wanted to make the product useful, not only to us, but to other people throughout the Bureau as well. We brought in CHS Coordinators, people from Intel, and people from the VC program. We did not want to think singularly about our violation. It is required by FBI policy that we

l non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it was CSAM; rather it was data to prove he and the victim of the investigation were together in various locations and cer

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it

t in our Intel supervisors. We wanted to make the product useful, not only to us, but to other people throughout the Bureau as well. We brought in CHS Coordinators, people from Intel, and people from the UC program. We did not want to think singularly about our violation. It is required by FBI policy that we