Epstein Secrets

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM related. For the Daskal case I EFTA00173591 completed a 69-page review. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of

on-CSAM related. For the Daskal case I EFTA00173591 completed a 69-page review. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it was CSAM For the Darnel Feagins case I was splitting the work. I did not do CSAM-related work from home. I did not take

very computer, matched one of them and is located in a room next to the lab, The other IP is one we don't recognize, but is the same address as the IPson our network, leading us to EFTA00173601 believe it was a computer that accessed our network somehow. We were not able to identify the computer, b

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but EFTA001735

l non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but EFTA00173526 none of it was CSAM; rather it was data to prove he and the victim of the investigation were together in various loc

very computer, matched one of them and is located in a room next to the lab, The other IP is one we don't recognize, but is the same address as the IPson our network, leading us to believe it was a computer that accessed our network somehow. We were not able to identify the computer, but it had to ha

l non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it was CSAM; rather it was data to prove he and the victim of the investigation were together in various locations and cer

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it

very computer, matched one of them and is located in a room next to the lab, The other IP is one we don't recognize, but is the same address as the IPson our network, leading us to believe it was a computer that accessed our network somehow. We were not able to identify the computer, but it had to ha