Epstein Secrets

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM related. For the Daskal case I EFTA00173591 completed a 69-page review. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of

on-CSAM related. For the Daskal case I EFTA00173591 completed a 69-page review. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it was CSAM For the Darnel Feagins case I was splitting the work. I did not do CSAM-related work from home. I did not take

purchases. I think they may have tried to change that after-the-fact. There was a financial threshold for the lab purchases. This was approved by Jack Cordes in OGC. It outlined what was needed for the C-20 lab and how we were going to use the equipment. I believe everything that needed an F number recei

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but EFTA001735

l non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but EFTA00173526 none of it was CSAM; rather it was data to prove he and the victim of the investigation were together in various loc

purchases. I think they may have tried to change that after-the- fact. There was a financial threshold for the lab purchases. This was approved by Jack Cordes in OGC. It outlined what was needed for the C-20 lab and how we were going to use the equipment. I believe everything that needed an F number recei

l non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it was CSAM; rather it was data to prove he and the victim of the investigation were together in various locations and cer

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it

ay have tried to change that after-the- 01/26/2024 New York, NY fact. There was a financial threshold for the lab purchases. This was approved by Jack Cordes in OGC. It outlined what was needed for the C-20 lab and how we were going to use the equipment. I believe everything that needed an F number recei