Epstein Secrets

. I have a lureau-issued laptop computer purposes. that I utilized for these At the time, I was working on three cases primarily: Robert Hadden, Darnel Feagins, and Jacob Daskal. To conduct the investigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns whi

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM related. For the Daskal case I EFTA00173591 completed a 69-page review. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of

on-CSAM related. For the Daskal case I EFTA00173591 completed a 69-page review. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it was CSAM For the Darnel Feagins case I was splitting the work. I did not do CSAM-related work from home. I did not take

or derivative evidence. FB SSA about r f exa les to !gab and requeitted.., At the time, I was working on three cases primarily: Robert Hadden, Darnel Feagins, and Jacob Daskal. Only one of these cases, Feagins, was a CSAM investigation. The Feagins investigation was the reason for my having to come to th

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but EFTA001735

l non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but EFTA00173526 none of it was CSAM; rather it was data to prove he and the victim of the investigation were together in various loc

e of these examples to INSD and can provide additional examples if requested. At the time, I was working on three cases primarily: Robert Hadden, Darnel Feagins, and Jacob Daskal. Only one of these cases, Feagins, was a CSAM investigation. The Feagins investigation was the reason for my having to come to th

l non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it was CSAM; rather it was data to prove he and the victim of the investigation were together in various locations and cer

vestigation for Hadden I was doing web- based interviews from home and writing FD-302s and subpoena returns which were all non-CSAM-related. For the Daskal case I completed a 68-page DExT review FD-302. I took metadata-related information. Some of it was exported from Daskal's computer, but none of it