Epstein Secrets

the Intellectual Property Theft of the

Shared Docs

Same-Page

5 / 5

Mentions

Document Mentions (5 shared documents)

EFTA00269283

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

n the two business developments obtained directly from the parties involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, John James the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvement were

of a business advisor of the Regional Development Board, Port Pirie as a registered client, Michael Fetherstonhaugh. In 2013 I proceeded to Contest the Intellectual Property Theft of the two business plan developments with an Intellectual Properly Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and -submitted Official Letters Of Involvement of the individu

EFTA00269360

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

of a business advisor of the Regional Development Board, Port Pirie as a registered client, Michael Fetherstonhaugh. In 2013 I proceeded to Contest the Intellectual Property Theft of the two business plan developments with an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and submitted Official Letters Of Involvement of the individua

EFTA00269369

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

of a business advisor of the Regional Development Board, Port Pine as a registered client, Michael Fetherstonhaugh. In 2013 I proceeded to Contest the Intellectual Property Theft of the two business plan developments with an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and submitted Official Letters Of Involvement of the individua

Sponsored

EFTA01725952

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

e in e wo business developments obtained directly from the parties involved and was seeking legal re resentation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Lawyers, the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Le ers of Involvement were involved or connect

in the Official Le ers of Involvement were involved or connected to the business plan developments and I was denied legal Representation to contest the Intellectual Property Theft of the two business plans. EFTA01725955 Following contesting the Intellectual Property Theft of the two business plans I then encountered an Extreme att

EFTA01660906

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

n the two business developments obtained directly from the parties involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvemen were involved or

Sponsored

Mutual Connections (81)

Entities connected to both Letters of Involvement and the Intellectual Property Theft of the

Kadina

12 w/ Letters·11 w/ the

Jeffrey Epstein

12 w/ Letters·9 w/ the

Ghislaine Maxwell

12 w/ Letters·8 w/ the

Adelaide

11 w/ Letters·6 w/ the

South Australia

11 w/ Letters·5 w/ the

Port Pirie

10 w/ Letters·6 w/ the

Intellectual Property Lawyer

6 w/ Letters·9 w/ the

Slater

8 w/ Letters·7 w/ the

Jacqueline Pearce

7 w/ Letters·8 w/ the

Commonwealth

7 w/ Letters·7 w/ the

Christopher Steele

8 w/ Letters·6 w/ the

the Australian Government Department

5 w/ Letters·8 w/ the

Georgina Chapman

6 w/ Letters·7 w/ the

Shaun Steele

7 w/ Letters·6 w/ the

John James

6 w/ Letters·7 w/ the

the Adelaide University

7 w/ Letters·5 w/ the

Johnson Lawyers

8 w/ Letters·4 w/ the

Peter Bannister

8 w/ Letters·4 w/ the

Queensland

7 w/ Letters·4 w/ the

Multiple Intellectual Property Theft