Epstein Secrets

133 17 01316 EFTA00234240 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 0721:2008 Page 18 of 100 DCA 1998) (approving reasoning in Feld & Sons, holding that "no public policy should allow [a plaintiff] to recover damages as a result of engaging in criminal conduct" where the plaintiff had

LEOPOLD: Objection. Asked and answered. THE WITNESS: No. 12 Q. After you left Epstein's house you took the 13 money and you went shopping with IIIIIIrand the other 14 girl in the car, correct? 15 A. Incorrect. I didn't spend any of the 16 money. 17 Q. You went to Marshall's, didn't you? 18

against public policy"). Based on the foregoing, the plaintiff cannot blame someone else (= ) for the consequences of her own criminal conduct. Cf. Feld & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolfe, Rounick and Cabot, 458 A.2d 545, 552 (Pa. Super. Ct, 1983) (holding that law-firm clients could not recover damag

and 9 answered. 10 THE WITNESS: No. 11 BY MR. TEIN: 12 Q. After you left Epstein's house you took the 13 money and you went shopping with IIIIIIrand the other 14 girl in the car, correct? 15 A. Incorrect. I didn't spend any of the 16 money. 1 Q. You went to Marshall's, didn't you? 18 A

are against public policy"). Based on the foregoing, the plaintiff cannot blame someone else for the consequences of her own criminal conduct. Cf. Feld & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolffe, Rounick and Cabot, 458 A.2d 545, 552 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1983) (holding that law-firm clients could not recover dama

and 9 answered. 10 THE WITNESS: No. 11 BY MR. TEIN: 12 Q. After you left Epstein's house you took the 13 money and you went shopping with IIIIIIrand the other 14 girl in the car, correct? 15 A. Incorrect. I didn't spend any of the 16 money. 17 Q. You went to Marshall's, didn't you? 18