4
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
ly and willfully intended to commit the offense" — i.e., that he intended to commit the crime. I 1 th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr., Special Instr. 11 ("Attempt(s)") (2003). Where, as here, the offense is completed, the statutory language requires only that the defendant knowingly persuade, induce, or entice s
Page: EFTA02857524_p10 →EFTA02857533 between states) or purely intrastate in nature (i.e., the telephone call was made to another telephone within the same state)."). In Drury, the defendant used his land-line telephone to call an undercover agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Geo
Page: EFTA02857524_p11 →hone call was between states) or purely intrastate in nature ( i.e. , the telephone call was made to another telephone within the same state)."). In Drury , the defendant used his land-line telephone to call an undercover agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Ge
Page: EFTA02857732_p6 →ngly and willfully intended to commit the offense" — i.e. , that he intended to commit the crime. 11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr., Special Instr. 11 ("Attempt(s)") (2003). Where, as here, the offense is completed, the statutory language requires only that the defendant knowingly persuade, induce, or entice s
Page: EFTA02857732_p30 →hone call was between states) or purely intrastate in nature ( i.e. , the telephone call was made to another telephone within the same state)."). In Drury , the defendant used his land-line telephone to call an undercover agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Ge
Page: EFTA02857763_p6 →ngly and willfully intended to commit the offense" — i.e. , that he intended to commit the crime. 11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr., Special Instr. 11 ("Attempt(s)") (2003). Where, as here, the offense is completed, the statutory language requires only that the defendant knowingly persuade, induce, or entice s
Page: EFTA02857763_p46 →hone call was between states) or purely intrastate in nature ( i.e. , the telephone call was made to another telephone within the same state)."). In Drury , the defendant used his land-line telephone to call an undercover agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Ge
Page: EFTA02857810_p6 →ngly and willfully intended to commit the offense" — i.e. , that he intended to commit the crime. 11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr., Special Instr. 11 ("Attempt(s)") (2003). Where, as here, the offense is completed, the statutory language requires only that the defendant knowingly persuade, induce, or entice s
Page: EFTA02857810_p29 →Entities connected to both Attempt(s and Drury
Ellis
PERSONDrury
PERSONOffense Instr
ORGANIZATIONthe Ninth Circuit
ORGANIZATIONthe Third Circuit's
ORGANIZATION
Robert Maxwell
PERSONChik-Fil-A.
ORGANIZATION
Lilly
ORGANIZATIONMeacham
PERSONVoiceStream
ORGANIZATION
Marc Rich
PERSONthe Florida Legislature
ORGANIZATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSONStrevell
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATION
Naomi Campbell
PERSONNorthern Region
LOCATIONJanusz Banasiak
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Philadelphia
LOCATION