Epstein Secrets

70; 2422(b) No Information 81 EFTA01729565 COVRt , • CASES `;,- - • SM .!. FACtSrOjitili ts11O,i I0N,, - . - - , S.D. Miss. U.S. v. Luxford, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1729589 (S.D. Miss. 2007) Slip Copy No Information No information available. Motion to transfer is denied. Discusses alleg

duction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(6) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 43 EFTA01729527 44 EFTA01729528 COURT . - ,-. r. ' , • •lc .f5 , , d • ',

ud R ! itit‘ tr.1 -44<liz.-•:.:.,rz- . ---. 1,!.. ' : 1 / - - . . FACILITV FACTS/COMM UNICA TION . . AR C.TI (;E S.D. Miss. U.S. v. Luxford, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1729589 (S.D. Miss. 2007) Slip Copy No Information No information available. Motion to transfer is denied. Discusses alle

uction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 43 EFTA00079456 COURT . ' C ES : i F - .• : FACTS COMMUNIC TION - ., U.S.

that no actual minor was involved and that statute is unconstitutional. Conviction affirmed. 2422(b) Not Consummated Sting S.D. Miss. U.S. I Luxford, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1729589 (SD. Miss 2007) Slip Copy Internet Defendant met 13 yr-old online; arranged to meet at the mall; when they met the

uction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 47 EFTA00226349 COURT CASES' FACILITY -.. .FACTS/COa1UNICKITON CHARGE •; U.S. I