5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
er 30, 2017 the SOF Program has delivered a strong performance with aggregate gross performance since inception of 1.6x gross multiple and 28% IRR (Internal Rate of Return) and 1.5x TVPI (Total Value to Paid-in Capital), 0.9x DPI (Distributions to Paid-in Capital) and 23% Net IRR to investors. More specifically: SOF
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
er 30, 2017 the SOF Program has delivered a strong performance with aggregate gross performance since inception of 1.6x gross multiple and 28% IRR (Internal Rate of Return) and 1.5x TVPI (Total Value to Paid-in Capital), 0.9x DPI (Distributions to Paid-in Capital) and 23% Net IRR to investors. More specifically: SOF
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
er 30, 2017 the SOF Program has delivered a strong performance with aggregate gross performance since inception of 1.6x gross multiple and 28% IRR (Internal Rate of Return) and 1.5x TVPI (Total Value to Paid-in Capital), 0.9x DPI (Distributions to Paid-in Capital) and 23% Net IRR to investors. More specifically: SOF
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
er 30, 2017 the SOF Program has delivered a strong performance with aggregate gross performance since inception of 1.6x gross multiple and 28% IRR (Internal Rate of Return) and 1.5x TVPI (Total Value to Paid-in Capital), 0.9x DPI (Distributions to Paid-in Capital) and 23% Net IRR to investors. More specifically: SOF
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
er 30, 2017 the SOF Program has delivered a strong performance with aggregate gross performance since inception of 1.6x gross multiple and 28% IRR (Internal Rate of Return) and 1.5x TVPI (Total Value to Paid-in Capital), 0.9x DPI (Distributions to Paid-in Capital) and 23% Net IRR to investors. More specifically: SOF
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
Entities connected to both Internal Rate of Return and Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund
Deirdre Davies
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSONGlendower
LOCATIONCharles Smith
PERSON
Deutsche Bank
ORGANIZATIONGlendower Capital
ORGANIZATIONSOF IV
ORGANIZATION
North America
LOCATIONDaVinci Portfolio
ORGANIZATIONChi Cheung
PERSONAdam Graev
PERSONSOF Team
ORGANIZATIONThe Carlyle Group
ORGANIZATION
Michael Douglas
PERSON
European Union
ORGANIZATION
Romania
LOCATION
Lithuania
LOCATION
Cyprus
LOCATION
Elena
PERSON
Northern Ireland
LOCATION