Epstein Secrets

Past performance is rat a 11111001:41 of the Mute performance of SCF, SOF D. SOF II or SOF III tow is included to demcnwrwe the track record of the Glick:Wow SOF Team There can be no aewarce that SOF ft/ will achieve competed° MEd% or that any target resultswill be acheved DPI = CeArbutions to Paid-In

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked partners sea • :new (mann Icor "dal*, • 1.6.61.1e

,4 Past performance is natal:fed:ten of the Mute performance of SOF, SOF D. SOF II or SOF III tow is included to demcnwrwe the track record of the Glick:Wow SOF Team There can be no aesurance that SOF ft/ will achieve canceiatle MEd% or that any target results will be acnieved DPI = Cearbutions to Pa

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to hinged partners • dppti (maw 1pw 61 ash • 1P:0r • ; Sac

Past performance is net a DfeCktell of the Mute performance of SOF, SOF D. SOF II or SOF III tow is included to demonstrate the track record of the Glick:Wow SOF Team There can be no aesurance that SOF ft/ win achieve canpeiade MEd% Ex that any target resultswill be acheved j1 DPI = Prarbutions to Pa

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to tanned partners sea 10% • claw (mane BC. 1pw .r3d wilt