Epstein Secrets

note from Gary's attorney at the top of the Settlement Agreement about being required to sign and deliver to Gary any necessary instrument to close the Estate of Annette Siegel and the Trusts seems unnecessary, as the expressed concerns would appear to be addressed in paragraph 7, which provides that "Each of the parties a

representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to MI Is the stated sum correct? Also, there is a reference in recital K to "50% of the b

note from Gary's attorney at the top of the Settlement Agreement about being required to sign and deliver to Gary any necessary instrument to close the Estate of Annette Siegel and the Trusts seems unnecessary, as the expressed concerns would appear to be addressed in paragraph 7, which provides that "Each of the parties a

representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to MI Is the stated sum correct? Also, there is a reference in recital K to "50% of the b

from Gary's attorney at the top of the Settlement Agreement about Peggy being required to sign and deliver to Gary any necessary instrument to close the Estate of Annette Siegel and the Trusts seems unnecessary, as the expressed concerns would appear to be addressed in paragraph 7, which provides that "Each of the parties ag

es as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. I agree. EFTA00626193 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to Peggy. Is the stated sum correct? Also, there is a reference in recital K to "50% of th

from Gary's attorney at the top of the Settlement Agreement ab=ut Peggy being required to sign and deliver to Gary any necessary instrument to close the Estate of Annette Siegel and the Trusts seems unnecessary, as the expressed concerns would appear to be addressed in paragraph 7, which provides that "Each of the parties ag

s representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to Peggy. Is the stated sum correct? Also, there is a reference in recita= K to "50% of th

from Gary's attorney at the top of the Settlement Agreement ab=ut Peggy being required to sign and deliver to Gary any necessary instrument to close the Estate of Annette Siegel and the Trusts seems unnecessary, as the expressed concerns would appear to be addressed in paragraph 7, which provides that "Each of the parties ag

s representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to Peggy. Is the stated sum correct? Also, there is a reference in recita= K to "50% of th