Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
note from Gary's attorney at the top of the Settlement Agreement about being required to sign and deliver to Gary any necessary instrument to close the Estate of Annette Siegel and the Trusts seems unnecessary, as the expressed concerns would appear to be addressed in paragraph 7, which provides that "Each of the parties a
ions of the Settlement Agreement should name Gary as a party, individually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to MI Is the
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
note from Gary's attorney at the top of the Settlement Agreement about being required to sign and deliver to Gary any necessary instrument to close the Estate of Annette Siegel and the Trusts seems unnecessary, as the expressed concerns would appear to be addressed in paragraph 7, which provides that "Each of the parties a
ions of the Settlement Agreement should name Gary as a party, individually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to MI Is the
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
from Gary's attorney at the top of the Settlement Agreement about Peggy being required to sign and deliver to Gary any necessary instrument to close the Estate of Annette Siegel and the Trusts seems unnecessary, as the expressed concerns would appear to be addressed in paragraph 7, which provides that "Each of the parties ag
ions of the Settlement Agreement should name Gary as a party, individually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. I agree. EFTA00626193 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
from Gary's attorney at the top of the Settlement Agreement ab=ut Peggy being required to sign and deliver to Gary any necessary instrument to close the Estate of Annette Siegel and the Trusts seems unnecessary, as the expressed concerns would appear to be addressed in paragraph 7, which provides that "Each of the parties ag
ions of the Settlement Agreement should name Gary as a party, individually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to Peggy. Is t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
from Gary's attorney at the top of the Settlement Agreement ab=ut Peggy being required to sign and deliver to Gary any necessary instrument to close the Estate of Annette Siegel and the Trusts seems unnecessary, as the expressed concerns would appear to be addressed in paragraph 7, which provides that "Each of the parties ag
ions of the Settlement Agreement should name Gary as a party, individually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to Peggy. Is t
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (9)
Entities connected to both the Estate of Annette Siegel and the Annette Trust
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON5 w/ the·5 w/ the
Trusts
ORGANIZATION5 w/ the·5 w/ the
the Marital Trust
ORGANIZATION5 w/ the·5 w/ the
AS
Annette Siegel
PERSON5 w/ the·5 w/ the
Recital K
ORGANIZATION5 w/ the·5 w/ the
PS
Peggy Siegal
PERSON3 w/ the·3 w/ the
UP
ut Peggy
PERSON2 w/ the·2 w/ the
MO
Martin O'Connor
PERSON2 w/ the·2 w/ the
G=
Gary =
PERSON2 w/ the·2 w/ the