Epstein Secrets

nce or actual malice, depending on the plaintiff's status; (4) falsity; (5) special damages or per se libel." February 27, 2016 Order at 6. See also McNamee v. Clemens, 762 F. Supp. 2d 584 (E.D. N.Y. 2011); Dillon v. City of New York, 261 A.D.2d 34 (1999). Ms. alleged that Defendant was involved with

(4) falsity; (5) special damages or per se libel." February 27, 2016 Order at 6. See also McNamee v. Clemens, 762 F. Supp. 2d 584 (E.D. N.Y. 2011); Dillon v. City of New York, 261 A.D.2d 34 (1999). Ms. alleged that Defendant was involved with a man named Jeffrey Epstein in the recruitment of girls, including m

nce or actual malice, depending on the plaintiff's status; (4) falsity; (5) special damages or per se libel." February 27, 2016 Order at 6. See also McNamee v. Clemens, 762 F. Supp. 2d 584 (E.D. N.Y. 2011); Dillon v. City of New York, 261 A.D.2d 34 (1999). Ms. alleged that Defendant was involved with

(4) falsity; (5) special damages or per se libel." February 27, 2016 Order at 6. See also McNamee v. Clemens, 762 F. Supp. 2d 584 (E.D. N.Y. 2011); Dillon v. City of New York, 261 A.D.2d 34 (1999). Ms. alleged that Defendant was involved with a man named Jeffrey Epstein in the recruitment of girls, including m

defendant...in the New York Post were in the nature of a general denial of plaintiff['s] accusations of misconduct, not an attack on plaintiffs."); McNamee v. Clemens, 762 F.Supp.2d 584, 601 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) ("[G]eneral denials aren't actionable."); Davis v. Boeheim, 24 N.Y.3d 262, 271-72 (N.Y. 2014). P

uately identifies the purported communication, and an indication of who made the communication, when it was made, and to whom it was communicated"); Dillon v. City of N.Y., 261 A.D.2d 34, 39-40 (1st Dep't 1999) (dismissing defamation complaint for, among other things, failing to specify the actual defamatory word

rivilege and therefore is not actionable. Further, general denials such as the January 3 Statement are not actionable as defamatory statements. See McNamee v. Clemens, 762 F.Supp.2d 584, 601 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) ("general denials of accusations aren't actionable"); Independent Living Aids, Inc. v. Mau-Aids,

provided in the Complaint. See Comp1.1 30. Her failure to provide the context within which the Statements were delivered alone warrants dismissal. Dillon v. City of New York, 261 A.D.2d 34, 39-40 (1st Dep't 1999) (plaintiff's failure to set forth the entirety of the alleged defamatory statement resulted in only