Epstein Secrets

the results as reported in the manuscript. since none of the conclusions changed after using these parallel analyses. For space-saving reasons, the ANOVA results are not reported if they did not differ from the regression results. Full ANOVA results an be obtained upon request from the first author.

ant correlations remained significant. The only exception was the female digit ratio x Nobel prizes correla- tion, which decreased from —.47 to —.41 (n.s.). The Nobel prizes with number of sexual partners correlations went from a non-significant .26 to a significant value of .33. Despite some small dif

ively, while Pig. 2B and C shows post-Bonferroni significant asymmetries for each sex. Although Pigs. 1 and 2 appear to suggest sex differences, an ANOVA failed to reveal significant interactions between sex and laterality in any ROI. 4. Discussion In this study we intentionally adopted a conservat

7 (17.52) <.05• Calcarine sulcus 3381.8 (699.1) 3903.7 (709.3) -7.21 (5.62) <.054 Central insular sulcus 289.1 (81) 258.5 (72.9) 5.73 (20.7) n.s. Central sulcus 3609.6 (492) 3488.8 (633) 1.96 (5.57) n.s. Cingulate and intracingulate sulci 6797.9 (956.1) 9525.1 (1372.4) -16.63 (6.06) <

ively, while Fig. 28 and C shows post-Bonferroni significant asymmetries for each sex. Although Figs. 1 and 2 appear to suggest sex differences, an ANOVA failed to reveal significant interactions between sex and laterality in any ROI. 4. Discussion In this study we intentionally adopted a conservat

3) —7.21 (5.62) <.05° Central insular sulcus 289.1 (81) 258.5 (72.9) 5.73 (20.7) ns. Central sulcus 3609.6 (492) 3488.8 (633) 1.96 (5.57) n.s. Cingulate and intracingulate sulci 6797.9 (956.1) 9525.1 (1372.4) -16.63 (6.06) <.05° Cingulate gyrus 4740.8 (968.5) 3979.2 (710.1) 8.44 (11.