Epstein Secrets

development began - Hand written form Installed on a computer not connected to the internet - April 13th 2013 Contesting of Intellectual Property / John James, Johnson Lawyers / 8th April 2013 Obtaining letters of Involvement in the Medical Business Plan Development Fraudulent activity continued - Resulti

and government involvement, following the targeted victim contesting in 2013 the Intellectual Property Theft of the Medical Business Plan with an Intellectual Property Lawyer, who denied Roger Kirchner, SA Health EFTA00261807 Involvement and the continuous reporting by the targeted victim of continuous accounts of reco

operty Theft under the act of Government targeting of an Individual In 2013 I contacted an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers, Adelaide, John James and contested to the effect of the Intellectual Property Theft of my 2006-2012 Medical Business Plan and M.S.I.C, Medical Professional Communicatio

edical Association - Confirmed in 2021 as Intellectual Property Theft under the act of Government targeting of an Individual In 2013 I contacted an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers, Adelaide, John James and contested to the effect of the Intellectual Property Theft of my 2006-2012 Medical Business Plan and M.S

an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and contested the Intellectual Property Theft of the Medical Business Plan and M.S.I.C. The lawyer, John James denied I had a Legal Case to contest and denied the involvement of Roger Kirchner, SA Health, Country SA in the Intellectual Property Theft and inv

are Centres and MISC and Patient Dashboard by the sources involved in the Intellectual Property Theft of the business plan. In 2013 I contacted an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and contested the Intellectual Property Theft of the Medical Business Plan and M.S.I.C. The lawyer, John James denied I had a Lega

an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and contested the Intellectual Property Theft of the Medical Business Plan and M.S.I.C. The lawyer, John James denied I had a Legal Case to contest and denied the involvement of Roger Kirchner, SA Health, Country SA in the Intellectual Property Theft and inv

are Centres and MISC and Patient Dashboard by the sources involved in the Intellectual Property Theft of the business plan. In 2013 I contacted an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and contested the Intellectual Property Theft of the Medical Business Plan and M.S.I.C. The lawyer, John James denied I had a Lega

an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and contested the Intellectual Property Theft of the Medical Business Plan and M.S.I.C. The lawyer, John James denied I had a Legal Case to contest and denied the involvement of Roger Kirchner, SA Health, Country SA in the Intellectual Property Theft and inv

are Centres and MISC and Patient Dashboard by the sources involved in the Intellectual Property Theft of the business plan. In 2013 I contacted an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and contested the Intellectual Property Theft of the Medical Business Plan and M.S.I.C. The lawyer, John James denied I had a Lega

involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, John James the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvement were involved or connected to the business plan developments

tered client, Michael Fetherstonhaugh. In 2013 I proceeded to Contest the Intellectual Property Theft of the two business plan developments with an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and submitted Official Letters Of Involvement of the individuals involved in the two business developments obtained directly from

involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, John James the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvement were involved or connected to the business plan developments

tered client, Michael Fetherstonhaugh. In 2013 I proceeded to Contest the Intellectual Property Theft of the two business plan developments with an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and submitted Official Letters Of Involvement of the individuals involved in the two business developments obtained directly from

involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, John James the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvement were involved or connected to the business plan developments

tered client, Michael Fetherstonhaugh. In 2013 I proceeded to Contest the Intellectual Property Theft of the two business plan developments with an Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers and submitted Official Letters Of Involvement of the individuals involved in the two business developments obtained directly from