Epstein Secrets

pment Board, listing the Business advisors involved and submitted both Letters of Involvement to the Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers, John James, who then denied the involvement of Roger Kirchner in the Medical Business Plans development. This denial alerted me to Suspicious Activity occurrin

SA Health. In 2016 I obtained a Letter of Involvement from the Regional Development Board, listing the Business advisors involved and submitted both Letters of Involvement to the Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers, John James, who then denied the involvement of Roger Kirchner in the Medical Business Plans d

pment Board, listing the Business advisors involved and submitted both Letters of Involvement to the intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers, John James, who then denied the involvement of Roger Kirchner in the Medical Business Plans development. This denial alerted me to Suspicious Activity occurrin

SA Health. In 2016 I obtained a Letter of Involvement from the Regional Development Board, listing the Business advisors involved and submitted both Letters of Involvement to the intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers, John James, who then denied the involvement of Roger Kirchner in the Medical Business Plans d

development began - Hand written form Installed on a computer not connected to the internet - April 13th 2013 Contesting of Intellectual Property / John James, Johnson Lawyers / 8th April 2013 Obtaining letters of Involvement in the Medical Business Plan Development Fraudulent activity continued - Resulti

ort Pirie SA. Johnson Lawyers - John James - Contesting Intellectual Property Theft May 2013 Denial of Roger Kirchner's involvement after providing Letters of Involvement supplied by Roger Kirchner. EFTA00264974 pACO - mic,(TARy - oNL(Ne oicriN6 - Dtb Nur it464:7----T IN PC=P-Se(`I SOL 1 (Wq MIDI ThlRy 1 601/4) SA

involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, John James the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvement were involved or connected to the business plan developments

n the two business developments obtained directly from the parties involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, John James the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvement were

involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, John James the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvement were involved or connected to the business plan developments

n the two business developments obtained directly from the parties involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, John James the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvement were

involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, John James the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvement were involved or connected to the business plan developments

n the two business developments obtained directly from the parties involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, John James the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvement were