Epstein Secrets

ervices produced and provided by Huawei or ZTE, and video surveillance and telecommunications equipment or services produced and provided by Hytera, Hikvision, or Dahua, or any subsidiaries or affiliates." This prohibition applies "to all U.S. government prime contractors, whether domestic or international

of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit "said the warrantless telephone dragnet that secretly collected millions of Americans' telephone records violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and may well have been unconstitutional." Politico <https://www.politico.cotn/news/2020/09/02/court-rules-nsa-phone-snooping-illegal-407727> (9/2,

rvices produced and provided by Huawei or ZTE, and video surveillance and telecommunications equipment or services produced and provided by Hytera, Hikvision, or Dahua, or any subsidiaries or affiliates." This prohibition applies "to all U.S. government prime contractors, whether domestic or international

of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit "said the warrantless telephone dragnet that secretly collected millions of Americans' telephone records violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and may well have been unconstitutional." Politico (9/2, Gerstein, 4.29M) reports the NSA program that "swept up details on billions of Americans'

rvices produced and provided by Huawei or ZTE, and video surveillance and telecommunications equipment or services produced and provided by Hytera, Hikvision, or Dahua, or any subsidiaries or affiliates." This prohibition applies "to all U.S. government prime contractors, whether domestic or international

of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit "said the warrantless telephone dragnet that secretly collected millions of Americans' telephone records violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and may well have been unconstitutional." Politico (9/2, Gerstein, 4.29M) reports the NSA program that "swept up details on billions of Americans'