Epstein Secrets

) reports the Department of Justice issued new guidance saying that under the Supreme Court's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the "Office of Justice Programs cannot exclude religious or evangelizing groups from eligibility for grant funding." In the case, the Court held that taxpayer-financed vouchers fo

tain programs under the Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs of the Department of Energy, and for other purposes', `S. 2716, A bill to amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes', `S. 2891, A bill to require the Secretary of the Interior to establish Tribal Wildlife Corridors, and for other purposes',

reports the Department of Justice issued new guidance saying that under the Supreme Court's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the "Office of Justice Programs cannot exclude religious or evangelizing groups from eligibility for grant funding." In the case, the Court held that taxpayer-financed vouchers for

tain programs under the Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs of the Department of Energy, and for other purposes', 'S. 2716, A bill to amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes, 'S. 2891, A bill to require the Secretary of the Interior to establish Tribal Wildlife Corridors, and for other purposes,

reports the Department of Justice issued new guidance saying that under the Supreme Court's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the "Office of Justice Programs cannot exclude religious or evangelizing groups from eligibility for grant funding." In the case, the Court held that taxpayer-financed vouchers for

tain programs under the Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs of the Department of Energy, and for other purposes', 'S. 2716, A bill to amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes, 'S. 2891, A bill to require the Secretary of the Interior to establish Tribal Wildlife Corridors, and for other purposes,