Epstein Secrets

's testimony "claiming officers followed all rules in a volatile situation paints a far different image than the prepared testimony from a major in the D.C. National Guard who later told the panel the protestors' removal was 'deeply disturbing' and appeared to be an infringement of their First Amendment rights." Monaha

reports the Department of Justice issued new guidance saying that under the Supreme Court's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the "Office of Justice Programs cannot exclude religious or evangelizing groups from eligibility for grant funding." In the case, the Court held that taxpayer-financed vouchers for

n's testimony "claiming officers followed all rules in a volatile situation paints a far different image than the prepared testimony from a major in the D.C. National Guard who later told the panel the protestors' removal was `deeply disturbing' and appeared to be an infringement of their First Amendment rights." Monah

) reports the Department of Justice issued new guidance saying that under the Supreme Court's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the "Office of Justice Programs cannot exclude religious or evangelizing groups from eligibility for grant funding." In the case, the Court held that taxpayer-financed vouchers fo

's testimony "claiming officers followed all rules in a volatile situation paints a far different image than the prepared testimony from a major in the D.C. National Guard who later told the panel the protestors' removal was 'deeply disturbing' and appeared to be an infringement of their First Amendment rights." Monaha

reports the Department of Justice issued new guidance saying that under the Supreme Court's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the "Office of Justice Programs cannot exclude religious or evangelizing groups from eligibility for grant funding." In the case, the Court held that taxpayer-financed vouchers for

's testimony "claiming officers followed all rules in a volatile situation paints a far different image than the prepared testimony from a major in the D.C. National Guard who later told the panel the protestors' removal was 'deeply disturbing' and appeared to be an infringement of their First Amendment rights." Monaha

reports the Department of Justice issued new guidance saying that under the Supreme Court's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the "Office of Justice Programs cannot exclude religious or evangelizing groups from eligibility for grant funding." In the case, the Court held that taxpayer-financed vouchers for