Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (126)
Entities connected to both Second Supplemental Privilege Log and the Export Administration Regulations
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON8 w/ Second·6 w/ the
United States
LOCATION8 w/ Second·6 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON8 w/ Second·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION8 w/ Second·4 w/ the
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON7 w/ Second·5 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Second·4 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Second·5 w/ the
Marc Rich
PERSON5 w/ Second·5 w/ the
New York
LOCATION4 w/ Second·5 w/ the
ZA
Zarrab
PERSON4 w/ Second·4 w/ the
BO
Bonestroo
PERSON4 w/ Second·4 w/ the
MD
Marc Dreier
PERSON4 w/ Second·4 w/ the
SC
Schlegel
PERSON4 w/ Second·4 w/ the
MF
Marc Allan Fernich
PERSON4 w/ Second·4 w/ the
David Mitchell
PERSON4 w/ Second·4 w/ the
Dominguez
PERSON4 w/ Second·4 w/ the
Steptoe
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Second·4 w/ the
Colorado
LOCATION4 w/ Second·4 w/ the
George Mitchell
PERSON4 w/ Second·4 w/ the
Jessup
LOCATION4 w/ Second·4 w/ the