Epstein Secrets

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but it

:km. ist INS/RUC TIONS ON TNT REVERSE OF THE FORM.) NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-Med I. (a) PLAINTIFFS In re: 34ne Poe (b) I'aunt) of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Bch . 1E X( EPT IN V.S. PLAINTIFF CASES, IC) athallath 'Finn 9•141. Addresi. and Telephone Nitimbeel &oh/ SPe t gpcevies- 115

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but it

ISLE INSTR V( TIONS ON III/ Res( RSI of 1111 fUR M 1 NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-flied I. (a) PLAINTIFFS 22; 34i/e. Poe (b) Count) of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff ech , 1E X(' EPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES, ICI ADO:Net% ,Fenn name. Addien. and Tekpbone Mambo, 7ac # .0,55'06 -tr.5 LOP ice

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but it

SE Of THE FORM.) NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-flied I. (a) PLAINTIFF'S DEFENDANTS on,repl $-67Pcs- -Z-; re: i -4ne. Poe (b) I:ounn of Residence of First Listed Plainlilf f skifrn BC4 lE X( EPS IN V.S. PLAINTIFF CASES, 'Finn game. Addrem. and Teleplione Rabe° am &rod oiPet 64sader is-ntsso6e-t-es