Epstein Secrets

ges — upon the government's learning that the state plea hearing had been scheduled, DE 14 at ¶ 11; DE 48 at 41. 3 EFTA00205604 B. Petitioners Lack Standing to Seek Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of

e estoppel precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Fla. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not availabl

ges — upon the government's learning that the state plea hearing had been scheduled, DE 14 at ¶ 11; DE 48 at 41. 3 EFTA00205626 B. Petitioners Lack Standing to Seek Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of

e estoppel precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Fla. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not availabl

14 at 9111; DE 48 at ¶41. 3 EFTA00799497 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 5 of 101 B. Petitioners Lack Standing to Seek Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of

e estoppel precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Ha. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not availab

14 at 9111; DE 48 at ¶41. 3 EFTA00795173 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 5 of 101 B. Petitioners Lack Standing to Seek Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of

e estoppel precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Ha. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not availab

4 at ¶ 11; DE 48 at ¶ 41. 3 EFTA00081018 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 5 of 101 B. Petitioners Lack Standing to Seek Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of

e estoppel precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Fla. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not availa

es — upon the government's learning that the state plea hearing had been scheduled, DE 14 at 9111; DE 48 at ¶41. 3 EFTA00208825 B. Petitioners Lack Standing to Seek Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of

e estoppel precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Ha. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not availab