Epstein Secrets

d OFM by letter that he intended to exercise his right of first refusal and renew the lease. Epstein contends that in a telephone conference between Richard Massey of OFM and Jeffrey Schantz, Epstein's transaction counsel, on April 19, 1996, OFM orally consented to Epstein's request to sublet the Premises to F

Federal Circuit and the Seventh Circuit concerning "whether federal common law or state law applies to the interpretation of Postal Service Leases." Kerin v. United States Postal Serv., 116 F.3d 988, 990 (2d Cir.1997). On the one hand, the Federal Circuit has held that federal law applies to resolve di

d OFM by letter that he intended to exercise his right of first refusal and renew the lease. Epstein contends that in a telephone conference between Richard Massey of OFM and Jeffrey Schantz, Epstein's transaction counsel, on April 19, 1996, OFM orally consented to Epstein's request to sublet the Premises to F

Federal Circuit and the Seventh Circuit concerning "whether federal common law or state law applies to the interpretation of Postal Service Leases." Kerin I United States Postal Serv., 116 F.3d 988, 990 (2d Cir.1997). On the one hand, the Federal Circuit has held that federal law applies to resolve dis

M by letter that he intended to exercise his right of first refusal and renew the lease. Epstein contends that in a telephone confer- ence between Richard Massey of OFM and EFTA00187393 Jeffrey Schantz, Epstein's transaction coun- sel, on April 19, 1996, OFM orally consented to Epstein's request to sublet

eral Circuit and the Seventh Circuit concerning "whether federal common law or state law applies to the inter- pretation of Postal Service Leases?' Kerin United States Postal Sera, 116 F2d 988, 990 (2d Cir.1997). On the one hand, the Federal Circuit has held that federal law applies to resolve disp