Epstein Secrets

priate in federal question cases where applicable federal substantive law exists, there is no federal statutory or common law 4. In United Stales! Bedford Associates, 657 Ii.2d 1300 (2d Cir.1981 , cert. denied, 456 U.S. 914. 102 S.Ct. 1767, 72 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982). the Sec. and Circuit upheld the district court's

ll or part of the Premises, or assign this lease or permit any other person to use the Premises with the advance written per- mission of Landlord" (Massey Decl., Exh. B at 4) (emphasis added). Epstein's and Fisher's argument that the word "may" sug- gests that OFM could approve a sublease or assignment in

disputes involving the Government. See Powers v. United States Postal Serv., 671 F.2d 1041, 1043-46 (7th Cir.1982). [FN6] FN4. In United States v. Bedford Associates, 657 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 914, 102 S.Ct. 1767, 72 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982), the Second Circuit upheld the district court's app

all or part of the Premises, or assign this lease or permit any other person to use the Premises with the advance written permission of Landlord." (Massey Decl., Exh. B at 4) (emphasis added). Epstein's and Fisher's argument that the word "may" suggests that OFM could approve a sublease or assignment in wr

t disputes involving the Government. See Powers v. United States Postal Serv., 671 F.2d 1041, 104346 (7th Cir.1982). [FN6] FN4. In United States v. Bedford Associates, 657 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 914, 102 S.Ct. 1767, 72 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982), the Second Circuit upheld the district court's appl

all or part of the Premises, or assign this lease or permit any other person to use the Premises with the advance written permission of Landlord." (Massey Decl., Exh. B at 4) (emphasis added). Epstein's and Fisher's argument that the word "may" suggests that OFM could approve a sublease or assignment in wri

nant disputes involving the Government. See Powers I United States Postal Serv., 671 F.2d 1041, 104346 (7th Cir.1982). [FN6] FN4. In United States Bedford Associates, 657 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 914, 102 S.Ct. 1767, 72 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982), the Second Circuit upheld the district court's appl

all or part of the Premises, or assign this lease or permit any other person to use the Premises with the advance written permission of Landlord." (Massey Decl., Exh. B at 4) (emphasis added). Epstein's and Fisher's argument that the word "may" suggests that OFM could approve a sublease or assignment in wri