Epstein Secrets

nguage of the clause meaningless, and I am obliged to read the lease in a manner that gives full force and effect to all clauses contained therein. See Lloyds Bank plc v. Republic of Ecuador, No. 96 Civ. 1789, 1998 WL 118170, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 1998). Accordingly, OFM could not have orally consented to Epste

ting "written confirmation" of OFM's alleged approval. By letter dated April 26, 1996, OFM formally responded to Epstein's request. In this letter, Thomas E. Burns, a representative of OFM, informed Epstein of OFM's intention to lease the Premises to Galinas beginning February 1, 1997 in the event that Epstein

anguage of the clause meaningless, and I am obliged to read the lease in a manner that gives full force and effect to all clauses contained therein. See Lloyds Bank plc v. Republic of Ecuador, No. 96 Civ. 1789, 1998 WL 118170, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 1998). Accordingly, OFM could not have orally consented to Epste

ting "written confirmation" of OFM's alleged approval. By letter dated April 26, 1996, OFM formally responded to Epstein's request. In this letter, Thomas E. Burns, a representative of OFM, informed Epstein of OFM's intention to lease the Premises to Galinas beginning February 1, 1997 in the event that Epstein

anguage of the clause meaningless, and I am obliged to read the lease in a manner that gives full force and effect to all clauses contained therein. See Lloyds Bank plc I. Republic of Ecuador, No. 96 Civ. 1789, 1998 WL 118170, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 1998). Accordingly, OFM could not have orally consented to Epste

ting "written confirmation" of OFM's alleged approval. By letter dated April 26, 1996, OFM formally responded to Epstein's request. In this letter, Thomas E. Burns, a representative of OFM, informed Epstein of OFM's intention to lease the Premises to Galinas beginning February I, 1997 in the event that Epstein