Epstein Secrets

ous unless it is reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, and the Court makes this determination by reference to the contract alone. Banque Arabe et Internationale d'Investissement v. Maryland Nat'I Bank, 57 F.3d 146, 152 (2d Cir.1995). The lease clearly provides that Epstein was required to obtain the advance written consent

ting "written confirmation" of OFM's alleged approval. By letter dated April 26, 1996, OFM formally responded to Epstein's request. In this letter, Thomas E. Burns, a representative of OFM, informed Epstein of OFM's intention to lease the Premises to Galinas beginning February 1, 1997 in the event that Epstein

ous unless it is reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, and the Court makes this determination by reference to the contract alone. Banque Arabe et Internationale d'Investissement v. Maryland Nat'l Bank, 57 F.3d 146, 152 (2d Cir.I995). The lease clearly provides that Epstein was required to obtain the advance written consent o

ting "written confirmation" of OFM's alleged approval. By letter dated April 26, 1996, OFM formally responded to Epstein's request. In this letter, Thomas E. Burns, a representative of OFM, informed Epstein of OFM's intention to lease the Premises to Galinas beginning February 1, 1997 in the event that Epstein

ous unless it is reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, and the Court makes this determination by reference to the contract alone. Banque Arabe et Internationale d'Investissement I Maryland Nat'l Bank, 57 F.3d 146, 152 (2d Cir.I995). The lease clearly provides that Epstein was required to obtain the advance written consent of

ting "written confirmation" of OFM's alleged approval. By letter dated April 26, 1996, OFM formally responded to Epstein's request. In this letter, Thomas E. Burns, a representative of OFM, informed Epstein of OFM's intention to lease the Premises to Galinas beginning February I, 1997 in the event that Epstein