Epstein Secrets

nformation and belief as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action by plaintiff United States of America (the "Government") on behalf of the Office of Foreign Missions ("OFM") of the United States Department of State (the "State Department") against defendants Jeffrey E. Epstein ("Epstein"), Ivan S. Fisher ("Fisher

. Ron Soffer ("Soifer") is a resident of both the State of New York and France, with a business address at 34 East 69th Street, New York, New York. Soifer is named as a defendant EFTA00223036 because he is an unapproved occupant of the Premises; has availed herself of the use and benefits of the Pre

her & Sophir ("Fisher & Soffer") is a general partnership with a business address at 34 East 69th Street, New York, New York. Defendants Fisher and Soifer are partners in Fisher & Soffer. Fisher & Soifer is named as a defendant because it is an unapproved occupant of the Premises; has availed itself of

e by the Deputy Consul General of the Islamic Re- public of Iran ("Iran"). After diplomatic and consular relations with Iran were severed in 1980, the Office of Foreign Missions ("0FM") of the United States Department of State took poas.ssion of the budding pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. § 4301 of seq. 0F

March 13, 1998, after the Government submitted its motion, Diane Fisher executed the stipula- tion and order, also agreeing to be bound. To date, Soifer still has not executed the stipulation. Hence, the Government's motion for summary judgment against the Subten- ants is still pending with respect

dence by the Deputy Consul General of the Islamic Republic of Iran ("Iran"). After diplomatic and consular relations with Iran were severed in 1980, the Office of Foreign Missions ("OFM") of the United States Department of State took possession of the building pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. s 4301 et seq. OFM

Ron Soffer, did not sign the stipulation. He has not responded to the Government's motion because the motion is not returnable until April 20, 1998. Soifer, however, can have no greater rights than Fisher. Hence, the Government's motion is granted as to Soffer as well. Of course, if Soffer believes he