Epstein Secrets

ssistant United States Attorney, New York, for the United States. Wachtel & Masyr, LLP, By Steven J. Cohen, Esq., New York, for Jeffrey E. Epstein. Gage & Pavlis, By G. Robert Gage, Jr., Esq., Ellen J. Casey, Esq., New York, for Ivan S. Fisher, Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group, and Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fi

l common law or state law applied because, in that case, federal law and state law led to the same result. See Kerin, 116 F.3d at 991. I agree with the Seventh Circuit's conclusion, for two reasons. First, although Epstein and Fisher argue that a federal rule should be created to promote the creation of a uniform bo

ssistant United States Attorney, New York, for the United States. Wachtel & Masyr, LLP, By Steven J. Cohen, Esq., New York, for Jeffrey E. Epstein. Gage & Pavlis, By G. Robert Gage, Jr., Esq., Ellen J. Casey, Esq., New York, for Ivan S. Fisher, Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group, and Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fi

l common law or state law applied because, in that case, federal law and state law led to the same result. See Kerin, 116 F.3d at 991. I agree with the Seventh Circuit's conclusion, for two reasons. First, although Epstein and Fisher argue that a federal rule should be created to promote the creation of a uniform bo

istant United States Attorney, New York, for the United States. Wachtel & Masyr, LLP, By Steven J. Cohen, Esq., New York, for Jeffrey E. Epstein. Gage & Pavlis, By G. Robert Gage, Jr., Esq., Ellen J. Casey, Esq., New York, for Ivan S. Fisher, Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group, and Fisher & Soffer a/k/a F

l common law or state law applied because, in that case, federal law and state law led to the same result. See Kerin, 116 F.3d at 991. I agree with the Seventh Circuit's conclusion, for two reasons. First, although Epstein and Fisher argue that a federal rule should be created to promote the creation of a uniform b