Epstein Secrets

e speaking with you again. I asked the back office to stop sending the dupe confirms to Greenwich Prime. The compliance letter that we received from Williams Trading was actually a letter requesting us to stop sending them the dupe confirms. I am including details of the cash promotion below that we spoke about.

<MI > To: n==la n Subject: FW: E*Trade Securities LLC Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:29:11 +0000 What is he talking about Williams trading for? From: Scarsdale Branch (mailto: Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:49 PM To: Ike Groff Subject: E*Trade Securities LLC ACCT Hi It was a pleasure speaking with you agai

From: ==l > To: Ike Groff •c:El > Subject: Re: E*Trade Securities LLC Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:35:23 +0000 i don't know ...he was saying Williams Trading when I was on the phone with him also...I said NO, not Williams Trading you have been sending confirms to Greenwich Prime...I asked him to stop sen

s he should have for you is Tourmaline. On Jan 17, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Ike Groff wrote: > What is he talking about Williams trading for? > • From: Scarsdale Branch (mailto: > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:49 PM > To: Ike Groff > Subject: E*Trade Securities LLC > • ACCT > • Hi > • It was a pleasure s

Message From: [mailto: Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:35 PM To: Ike Groff Subject: Re: E*Trade Securities LLC i don't know ...he was saying Williams Trading when I was on the phone with him also...I said NO, not Williams Trading you have been sending confirms to Greenwich Prime...I asked him to stop sen

s he should have for you is Tourmaline. On Jan 17, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Ike Groff wrote: > What is he talking about Williams trading for? > • From: Scarsdale Branch (mailto: > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:49 PM > To: Ike Groff > Subject: E*Trade Securities LLC > • ACCT > • Hi > • It was a pleasure s

rom: (mailto• > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:35 PM > To: Ike Groff > Subject: Re: E*Trade Securities LLC > • i don't know ...he was saying Williams Trading when I was on the phone with him also...I said NO, not Williams Trading you have been sending confirms to Greenwich Prime...I asked him to stop sen

should have for you is Tourmaline. > On Jan 17, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Ike Groff wrote: >> What is he talking about Williams trading for? >> >> From: Scarsdale Branch (mailto: >> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:49 PM >> To: Ike Groff >> Subject: E*Trade Securities LLC » ACCT >> >> Hi >> >> It was a pleasu

rom: (mailto• > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:35 PM > To: Ike Groff > Subject: Re: E*Trade Securities LLC > • i don't know ...he was saying Williams Trading when I was on the phone with him also...I said NO, not Williams Trading you have been sending confirms to Greenwich Prime...I asked him to stop sen

should have for you is Tourmaline. > On Jan 17, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Ike Groff wrote: >> What is he talking about Williams trading for? >> >> From: Scarsdale Branch (mailto: >> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:49 PM » To: Ike Groff >> Subject: E*Trade Securities LLC >> >> ACCT >> >> Hi >> >> It was a pl

[mailto: >> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:35 PM >> To: Ike Groff >> Subject: Re: E*Trade Securities LLC >> >> i don't know ...he was saying Williams Trading when I was on the phone with him also...I said NO, not Williams Trading you have been sending confirms to Greenwich Prime...I asked him to stop sen

for you is Tourmaline. >> >> On Jan 17, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Ike Groff wrote: >> >>> What is he talking about Williams trading for? >>> >>> From: Scarsdale Branch [mailto: >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:49 PM >>> To: Ike Groff >>> Subject: E*Trade Securities LLC >>> >>> ACCT XXXX- >>> >>> Hi >>>