Epstein Secrets

/conservatives-turn-antitrust-hearing-into-venting-session-about-bias-lca016ec-57c2- 475a-807b-1a1bbfal0753.html> (7/29, Fischer, 521K) reports Reps. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) "used their first few minutes during their opening statements at the hearing...to call out tech companies for

e industry." The Washington Post <https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/07/29/apple-google-facebook-amazon-congress-hearingt> (7/29, Romm, Zakrzewski, Lerman, 14.2M) reports, "The rare interrogation played out over the course of a nearly six-hour hearing, with lawmakers on the House's top antitrus

cebook board's decision was 'extremely disappointing' and that it was 'clear that Mark Zuckerberg views himself as the arbiter of free speech.' Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) "said Facebook, which faces antitrust scrutiny, should be broken up." Fox News <https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-ban-conservatives-fac

stated by the end of the year." The Washington Post <https://vvww.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/05/05/facebook-trump-decision/> (5/5, Dwoskin, Zakrzewski, 10.52M) reports that "in its response to the decision, Facebook emphasized that Trump would remain off the social network for the time being, follo

"offered a full-throated defense of his much-criticized conduct in the federal probe of Russian election interference." CNBC also reports that Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), the committee's ranking member, "launched into his opening statement by decrying the Russia probe as a coordinated effort by Democrats to u

h their concerns of liberal bias at the Silicon Valley companies and accusations that conservative voices are censored." The Washington Post (7/28, Zakrzewski, 14.2M) similarly says, "There are signs Republicans intend to raise unproven accusations that tech companies are biased against conservatives." On

cebook board's decision was 'extremely disappointing' and that it was 'dear that Mark Zuckerberg views himself as the arbiter of free speech." Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) "said Facebook, which faces antitrust scrutiny, should be broken up." Fox News (5/5, Fordham, 23.99M) reports on its website that conservati

from the platform, but it has also opened the door for him to be potentially reinstated by the end of the year." The Washington Post (5/5, Dwoskin, Zakrzewski, 10.52M) reports that "in its response to the decision, Facebook emphasized that Trump would remain off the social network for the time being, foll

"offered a full-throated defense of his much-criticized conduct in the federal probe of Russian election interference." CNBC also reports that Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), the committee's ranking member, "launched into his opening statement by decrying the Russia probe as a coordinated effort by Democrats to un

Post <https://www.washingtonpost.corn/politics/2020/07/28/technology-202- republicans-poised-reignite-claims-political-bias-big-tech-hearing/> (7/28, Zakrzewski, I4.2M) similarly says, 'There are signs Republicans intend to raise unproven accusations that tech companies are biased against conservatives." On

ebook board's decision was `extremely disappointing' and that it was `clear that Mark Zuckerberg views himself as the arbiter of free speech." Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) "said Facebook, which faces antitrust scrutiny, should be broken up." Fox News (5/5, Fordham, 23.99M) reports on its website that conservati

from the platform, but it has also opened the door for him to be potentially reinstated by the end of the year." The Washington Post (5/5, Dwoskin, Zakrzewski, 10.52M) reports that "in its response to the decision, Facebook emphasized that Trump would remain off the social network for the time being, foll

as the top concern, while conceding it is not an issue that can be solved through antitrust enforcement." Axios (7/29, Fischer, 521K) reports Reps. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) "used their first few minutes during their opening statements at the hearing...to call out tech companies for

' practices before Congress as a House panel caps its yearlong investigation of market dominance in the industry." The Washington Post (7/29, Romm, Zakrzewski, Lerman, 14.2M) reports, "The rare interrogation played out over the course of a nearly six-hour hearing, with lawmakers on the House's top antitrus

"offered a full-throated defense of his much-criticized conduct in the federal probe of Russian election interference." CNBC also reports that Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), the committee's ranking member, "launched into his opening statement by decrying the Russia probe as a coordinated effort by Democrats to u

h their concerns of liberal bias at the Silicon Valley companies and accusations that conservative voices are censored." The Washington Post (7/28, Zakrzewski, 14.2M) similarly says, "There are signs Republicans intend to raise unproven accusations that tech companies are biased against conservatives." On

as the top concern, while conceding it is not an issue that can be solved through antitrust enforcement." Axios (7/29, Fischer, 521K) reports Reps. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) "used their first few minutes during their opening statements at the hearing...to call out tech companies for

' practices before Congress as a House panel caps its yearlong investigation of market dominance in the industry." The Washington Post (7/29, Romm, Zakrzewski, Lerman, 14.2M) reports, "The rare interrogation played out over the course of a nearly six-hour hearing, with lawmakers on the House's top antitrus

"offered a full-throated defense of his much-criticized conduct in the federal probe of Russian election interference." CNBC also reports that Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), the committee's ranking member, "launched into his opening statement by decrying the Russia probe as a coordinated effort by Democrats to u

h their concerns of liberal bias at the Silicon Valley companies and accusations that conservative voices are censored." The Washington Post (7/28, Zakrzewski, 14.2M) similarly says, "There are signs Republicans intend to raise unproven accusations that tech companies are biased against conservatives." On