Epstein Secrets

pean Court of Justice (CJEU) in Schrems II is gobsmacking in its mix of judicial imperialism and Eurocentric hypocrisy. The decision invalidates the Privacy Shield agreement between the US and the EU on the ground that US protections for individual rights are not 'adequate.' It manages to do this while acknowl

Great American Outdoors Act', plus consideration of `H.R. 7573 — To direct the Architect of the Capitol to replace the bust of Roger Brooke Taney in the Old Supreme Court Chamber of the United States Capitol with a bust of Thurgood Marshall to be obtained by the Joint Committee on the Library and to remove certain statues fr

ean Court of Justice (CJEU) in Schrems II is gobsmacking in its mix of judicial imperialism and Eurocentric hypocrisy. The decision invalidates the Privacy Shield agreement between the US and the EU on the ground that US protections for individual rights are not 'adequate.' It manages to do this while acknowl

Great American Outdoors Act; plus consideration of 'H.R. 7573 - To direct the Architect of the Capitol to replace the bust of Roger Brooke Taney in the Old Supreme Court Chamber of the United States Capitol with a bust of Thurgood Marshall to be obtained by the Joint Committee on the Library and to remove certain statues fr

ean Court of Justice (CJEU) in Schrems II is gobsmacking in its mix of judicial imperialism and Eurocentric hypocrisy. The decision invalidates the Privacy Shield agreement between the US and the EU on EFTA01658217 the ground that US protections for individual rights are not `adequate.' It manages to do this

Great American Outdoors Act; plus consideration of 'H.R. 7573 - To direct the Architect of the Capitol to replace the bust of Roger Brooke Taney in the Old Supreme Court Chamber of the United States Capitol with a bust of Thurgood Marshall to be obtained by the Joint Committee on the Library and to remove certain statues fr