4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 8
Mentions
, 30 Jun 2010 13:28:07 +0000 good first step.. On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:23 AM, PETER MANDELSON < wrote: As you were saying - - On Wed, 30/6/10, Martin Armstrong > wrote: From: Martin Armstrong alEM IEB Subject: Colin Grassie To: Cc: "Serena Cole" Date: Wednesday, 30 June, 2010, 14:16 Dear Peter , I spok
. In our meeting we discussed a retainer of 1million Dollars per annum and a discretionary bonus based upon a year end conversation between you and Anshu and Colin Grassie . We agreed that this was a better way than a formulaic approach because your contribution would be hard to quantify and would be
he Bank . In this meeting we agreed the parameters for a further discussion with Anshu Jain next week . The context of their interest in you is that Anshu has now taken responsibility for the Investment Bank and he needs to arrange the Bank's relationships with its customers more effectively . He would
bject: Re: Fw: Colin Grassie good first step.. On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:23 AM, PETER MANDELSON > wrote: As you were saying - - On Wed, 30/6/10, Martin Armstrong From: Martin Armstrong < Subject: Colin Grassie To: Cc: "Serena Cole" Date: Wednesday, 30 June, 2010, 14:16 Dear Peter , wrote: I spoke with
. In our meeting we discussed a retainer of 1million Dollars per annum and a discretionary bonus based upon a year end conversation between you and Anshu and Colin Grassie . We agreed that this was a better way than a formulaic approach because your contribution would be hard to quantify and would be
he Bank . In this meeting we agreed the parameters for a further discussion with Anshu Jain next week . The context of their interest in you is that Anshu has now taken responsibility for the Investment Bank and he needs to arrange the Bank's relationships with its customers more effectively . EFTA007
ject: Re: Fw: Colin Grassie good first step.. On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:23 AM, PETER MANDELSON < > wrote: As you were saying -- On Wed, 30/6/10, Martin Armstrong From: Martin Armstrong Subject: Colin Grassie To: Cc: "Serena Cole" Date: Wednesday, 30 June, 2010, 14:16 Dear Peter , wrote: I spoke with Col
. In our meeting we discussed a retainer of 1million Dollars per annum and a discretionary bonus based upon a year end conversation between you and Anshu and Colin Grassie . We agreed that this was a better way than a formulaic approach because your contribution would be hard to quantify and would be
he Bank . In this meeting we agreed the parameters for a further discussion with Anshu Jain next week . The context of their interest in you is that Anshu has now taken responsibility for the Investment Bank and he needs to arrange the Bank's relationships with its customers more effectively . He woul
comUeevacation@gmaiLcom] From: PETER MANDELSON Sent Wed 6/30/2010 1:23:54 PM Subject Fw: Conn Grassie As you were saying --- On Wed, 30/6/10, Martin Armstrong From: Martin Armstrong •al liM Subject: Cohn Grassic To: petermandelso Cc: "Serena Cole" Date: Wednesday, 30 June, 2010, 14:16 Dear Peter , ro
. In our meeting we discussed a retainer of 1million Dollars per annwn and a discretionary bonus based upon a year end conversation between you and Anshu and Colin Grassic . We agreed that this was a better way than a fonnulaic approach because your contribution would be hard to quantify and would be
e Bank . In this meeting we agreed the parameters for a further discussion with Anshu Jain next week . The context of their interest in you is that Anshu has now taken responsibility for the Investment Bank and he needs to arrange the Batik's relationships with its customers more effectively . Ile wou
Entities connected to both Martin Armstrong and Anshu Parashar

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Peter Mandelson
PERSONMailController
ORGANIZATION
Anshu Jain
PERSONSerena Cole
PERSONSerena
PERSONthe Investment Bank
ORGANIZATIONColin Grassie
PERSONpetey„
PERSON