Epstein Secrets

. However, as detailed in the memo below, prepared by a lawyer familiar with the that the federal government has been overly zealous in pursuing Mr. Rubashkin and has si considerably more severe restrictions and potential punishment than others in similar case: quite an eye-opener, well worth reading despit

jury t and failure to pay cattle owners promptly. The enormous disparity between the treatment of Mr. Rubashkin and others who c offenses began with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") raid on Agriproce May 12, 2008, and has continued to this day. 1. Should ICE Have Conducted the Massive May 2008 Raid? Because it was appar

nd circumstances of the crime and the purpose and scope of the crime have to be part of the punishment equation. Even the prosecutors agree that Mr. Rubashkin did not gain personally from this crime and that the only reason why he committed the crime was to try to save his fathers business from going unde

e to pay cattle owners promptly. The enormous disparity between the treatment of Mr. Rubashkin and others who committed similar offenses began with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") raid on Agriprocessors ("Agri") on May 12, 2008, and has continued to this day. 1. Should ICE Have Conducted the Massive May 2008 Raid? Be

nd circumstances of the crime and the purpose and scope of the crime have to be part of the punishment equation. Even the prosecutors agree that Mr. Rubashkin did not gain personally from this crime and that the only reason why he committed the crime was to try to save his fathers business from going unde

e to pay cattle owners promptly. The enormous disparity between the treatment of Mr. Rubashkin and others who committed similar offenses began with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") raid on Agriprocessors ("Agri") on May 12, 2008, and has continued to this day. 1. Should ICE Have Conducted the Massive May 2008 Raid? Be