Epstein Secrets

Rubashkin Shalom Rubashkin Chief District Judge Linda Reade both coordinated with prosecutors and acted as judge in the contentious conviction of Agriprocessors kosher slaughterhouse operator Sholom Rubashkin, according to internal federal documents and court filings obtained by this reporter. According to

d prosecution "game plan- nearly from its planning inception in October, 2007 some six months before the raid and long before the ultimate trial of Rubashkin before her. Her continuous week-to-week involvement in the organization of the mid and ultimate prosecution was not disclosed to defense counsel or

laws and how Iowa federal prosecut case of Sholom Rubashkin, the Orthodox Jewish Hasidic businessman who was arrested law violations relating to the Agriprocessors plant in Iowa and was found guilty after a jury t and failure to pay cattle owners promptly. The enormous disparity between the treatment of Mr. Rub

. However, as detailed in the memo below, prepared by a lawyer familiar with the that the federal government has been overly zealous in pursuing Mr. Rubashkin and has si considerably more severe restrictions and potential punishment than others in similar case: quite an eye-opener, well worth reading despit

cutors treated the case of Sholom Rubashkin, the Orthodox Jewish Hasidic businessman who was arrested on immigration-law violations relating to the Agriprocessors plant in Iowa and was found guilty after a jury trial of bank fraud and failure to pay cattle owners promptly. The enormous disparity between the t

nd circumstances of the crime and the purpose and scope of the crime have to be part of the punishment equation. Even the prosecutors agree that Mr. Rubashkin did not gain personally from this crime and that the only reason why he committed the crime was to try to save his fathers business from going unde

cutors treated the case of Sholom Rubashkin, the Orthodox Jewish Hasidic businessman who was arrested on immigration-law violations relating to the Agriprocessors plant in Iowa and was found guilty after a jury trial of bank fraud and failure to pay cattle owners promptly. The enormous disparity between the t

nd circumstances of the crime and the purpose and scope of the crime have to be part of the punishment equation. Even the prosecutors agree that Mr. Rubashkin did not gain personally from this crime and that the only reason why he committed the crime was to try to save his fathers business from going unde