Epstein Secrets

erms, this could affect our ability to use certain intellectual property and could also result in substantial monetary liabilities. In addition, Mr. Morley filed a subsequent lawsuit containing allegations that the formation of Square and the development of our card reader and decoding technologies cons

commercial disputes, and other matters. For example, we have been served with a putative class action complaint filed on behalf of couriers for our Caviar subsidiary alleging that the couriers have been improperly denied reimbursement for business expenses due to their classification as independent con

e recently amended claims, which have not yet progressed beyond preliminary reexamination, all of the claims from the three patents asserted in Mr. Morley's 2010 complaint have either been canceled or otherwise found unpatentable by the Patent Office Trial and Appeals Board. On January 30, 2014, Mr. M

er. On March 19, 2015. Jeffry Levin filed a putative class action lawsuit against Caviar, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Square), alleging that Caviar misclassified Mr. Levin and other similarly situated couriers as independent contractors under the provisions of the California Labor Code and claim

ed or otherwise found unpatentable by the PTAB. On January 30, 2014, three weeks after the PTAB hearing that resulted in the rejection of all of Mr. Morley's and REM's remaining claims of the patents in the 2010 Complaint, Mr. Morley and REM filed a complaint against us and against Jack Dorsey and Mr.

ide class, filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of California against our wholly owned subsidiary, Caviar, Inc., which, as amended, alleges that Caviar misclassified Mr. Levin and other similarly situated couriers as independent contractors and, in doing so, violated various provisions of 146 Tabl