Epstein Secrets

mation on SOF D has not been included on this slide because SOF D is a single transaction / top-up fund raised in 2010 to underwrite pari-passu the DaVinci transaction with SOF. Glendower does not expect that similar transactions will be available to SOF IV. Confidential Private Placement Memorandum

mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund

mation on SOF D has not been included on this slide because SOF D is a single transaction / top-up fund raised in 2010 to underwrite pari-passu the DaVinci transaction with SOF. Glendower does not expect that similar transactions will be available to SOF IV. Confidential Private Placement Memorandum

mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund

mation on SOF D has not been included on this slide because SOF D is a single transaction / top-up fund raised in 2010 to underwrite pari-passu the DaVinci transaction with SOF. Glendower does not expect that similar transactions will be available to SOF IV. Confidential Private Placement Memorandum

mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund

mation on SOF D has not been included on this slide because SOF D is a single transaction / top-up fund raised in 2010 to underwrite pari-passu the DaVinci transaction with SOF. Glendower does not expect that similar transactions will be available to SOF IV. Confidential Private Placement Memorandum

mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund

mation on SOF D has not been included on this slide because SOF D is a single transaction / top-up fund raised in 2010 to underwrite pari-passu the DaVinci transaction with SOF. Glendower does not expect that similar transactions will be available to SOF IV. Confidential Private Placement Memorandum

mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund