Epstein Secrets

aw in landlord-tenant disputes involving the Government, there is no "distinct need" for a nationwide legal standard or a uniform national rule. See Kamen, 500 U.S. at 98. Landlord- tenant law traditionally has been a matter of state law. There is no compelling reason to disrupt expectations that tenan

t disputes involving the Government. See Powers v. United States Postal Serv., 671 F.2d 1041, 104346 (7th Cir.1982). [FN6] FN4. In United States v. Bedford Associates, 657 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 914, 102 S.Ct. 1767, 72 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982), the Second Circuit upheld the district court's appl

tenant disputes involving the Government, there is no "distinct need" for a EFTA00223057 nationwide legal standard or a uniform national rule. See Kamen, 500 U.S. at 98. Landlord- tenant law traditionally has been a matter of state law. There is no compelling reason to disrupt expectations that tenan

nant disputes involving the Government. See Powers I United States Postal Serv., 671 F.2d 1041, 104346 (7th Cir.1982). [FN6] FN4. In United States Bedford Associates, 657 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 914, 102 S.Ct. 1767, 72 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982), the Second Circuit upheld the district court's appl

landlord-tenant disputes involving the Gov- ernment, there is no "distinct need" for a nationwide legal standard or a uniform na- tional rule. See Kamen, 500 U.S. at 98 Ill S.Ct, 1711. Landlord-tenant law traditional- ly has been a matter of state law. There is no compelling reason to disrupt expect

priate in federal question cases where applicable federal substantive law exists, there is no federal statutory or common law 4. In United Stales! Bedford Associates, 657 Ii.2d 1300 (2d Cir.1981 , cert. denied, 456 U.S. 914. 102 S.Ct. 1767, 72 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982). the Sec. and Circuit upheld the district court's

w in landlord-tenant disputes involving the Government, there is no "distinct need" for a nationwide legal standard or a uniform national rule. See Kamen, 500 U.S. at 98. Landlord- tenant law traditionally has been a matter of state law. There is no compelling reason to disrupt expectations that tena

disputes involving the Government. See Powers v. United States Postal Serv., 671 F.2d 1041, 1043-46 (7th Cir.1982). [FN6] FN4. In United States v. Bedford Associates, 657 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 914, 102 S.Ct. 1767, 72 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982), the Second Circuit upheld the district court's app