Epstein Secrets

f good faith," and discovery is "unnecessary if the agency's submissions are adequate on their face." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Wilner v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69 (2d Cr. 2009). An agency's justification for asserting an exemption "is sufficient if it appears logical and plausible." Am

g information of BOP employees under Exemption 7(F). See Jordan, 668 F.3d at 1198 (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP Supermax roster); Pinson v. Dep 't opustice, 236 F. Supp. 3d 388, 370 (D.D.C. 2017) (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP assignment rosters). IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its D

f good faith," and discovery is "unnecessary if the agency's submissions are adequate on their face." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Wilner v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69 (2d Cr. 2009). An agency's justification for asserting an exemption "is sufficient if it appears logical and plausible." Am

g information of BOP employees under Exemption 7(F). See Jordan, 668 F.3d at 1198 (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP Supermax roster); Pinson v. Dep 't opustice, 236 F. Supp. 3d 388, 370 (D.D.C. 2017) (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP assignment rosters). IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its D

f good faith," and discovery is "unnecessary if the agency's submissions are adequate on their face." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Wilner v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69 (2d Cr. 2009). An agency's justification for asserting an exemption "is sufficient if it appears logical and plausible." Am

g information of BOP employees under Exemption 7(F). See Jordan, 668 F.3d at 1198 (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP Supermax roster); Pinson v. Dep 't opustice, 236 F. Supp. 3d 388, 370 (D.D.C. 2017) (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP assignment rosters). IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its D