Epstein Secrets

f good faith," and discovery is "unnecessary if the agency's submissions are adequate on their face." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Wilner v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69 (2d Cr. 2009). An agency's justification for asserting an exemption "is sufficient if it appears logical and plausible." Am

t show that disclosure of the information in these records is likely to offer any significant insight into BOP operations. Particularly in light of the New York City Medical Examiner's public conclusion that Epstein hanged himself, the specific details of his suicide or the appearance of his body shortly thereafter do not shed any

f good faith," and discovery is "unnecessary if the agency's submissions are adequate on their face." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Wilner v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69 (2d Cr. 2009). An agency's justification for asserting an exemption "is sufficient if it appears logical and plausible." Am

t show that disclosure of the information in these records is likely to offer any significant insight into BOP operations. Particularly in light of the New York City Medical Examiner's public conclusion that Epstein hanged himself, the specific details of his suicide or the appearance of his body shortly thereafter do not shed any

f good faith," and discovery is "unnecessary if the agency's submissions are adequate on their face." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Wilner v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69 (2d Cr. 2009). An agency's justification for asserting an exemption "is sufficient if it appears logical and plausible." Am

t show that disclosure of the information in these records is likely to offer any significant insight into BOP operations. Particularly in light of the New York City Medical Examiner's public conclusion that Epstein hanged himself, the specific details of his suicide or the appearance of his body shortly thereafter do not shed any