Epstein Secrets

f good faith," and discovery is "unnecessary if the agency's submissions are adequate on their face." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Wilner v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69 (2d Cr. 2009). An agency's justification for asserting an exemption "is sufficient if it appears logical and plausible." Am

the requested public disclosure and interference with the government's ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooke,. v. Bureau ofAlcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, 789 F.2d 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 1986); New York Times Co. v. Dep't opustice, No. 14 Civ. 03776 (AT) (SN), 2016 WL 5946711, at *7 (S.D.N.Y

f good faith," and discovery is "unnecessary if the agency's submissions are adequate on their face." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Wilner v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69 (2d Cr. 2009). An agency's justification for asserting an exemption "is sufficient if it appears logical and plausible." Am

the requested public disclosure and interference with the government's ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooke,. v. Bureau ofAlcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, 789 F.2d 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 1986); New York Times Co. v. Dep't opustice, No. 14 Civ. 03776 (AT) (SN), 2016 WL 5946711, at *7 (S.D.N.Y

f good faith," and discovery is "unnecessary if the agency's submissions are adequate on their face." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); accord Wilner v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69 (2d Cr. 2009). An agency's justification for asserting an exemption "is sufficient if it appears logical and plausible." Am

the requested public disclosure and interference with the government's ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooke,. v. Bureau ofAlcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, 789 F.2d 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 1986); New York Times Co. v. Dep't opustice, No. 14 Civ. 03776 (AT) (SN), 2016 WL 5946711, at *7 (S.D.N.Y