Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
"jurisdictional hook," the hook is too weakly connected to the problem (sexual crimes against minors) to sustain the statute as a proper exercise of Commerce Clause power. Questions about the nature of federalism, and, specifically, just how far the federal government may go into matters of traditionally state
is addressed to those who purposely and intentionally target children. Here, there was no such targeting. As the Sixth Circuit said in rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the statute: "The statute only applies to those who `knowingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or enticesminors. United St
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
"jurisdictional hook," the hook is too weakly connected to the problem (sexual crimes against minors) to sustain the statute as a proper exercise of Commerce Clause power. Questions about the nature of federalism, and, specifically, just how far the federal government may go into matters of traditionally state
is addressed to those who purposely and intentionally target children. Here, there was no such targeting. As the Sixth Circuit said in rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the statute: "The statute only applies to those who `knowingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice minors. United St
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
"jurisdictional hook," the hook is too weakly connected to the problem (sexual crimes against minors) to sustain the statute as a proper exercise of Commerce Clause power. Questions about the nature of federalism, and, specifically, just how far the federal government may go into matters of traditionally state
is addressed to those who purposely and intentionally target children. Here, there was no such targeting. As the Sixth Circuit said in rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the statute: "The statute only applies to those who `knowingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice minors. United St
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
'jurisdictional hook," the hook is too weakly connected to the problem (sexual crimes against minors) to sustain the statute as a proper exercise of Commerce Clause power. Questions about the nature of federalism, and, specifically, just how far the federal government may go into matters of traditionally state
is addressed to those who purposely and intentionally target children. Here, there was no such targeting. As the Sixth Circuit said in rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the statute: "The statute only applies to those who 'knowingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice minors. United St
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
"jurisdictional hook," the hook is too weakly connected to the problem (sexual crimes against minors) to sustain the statute as a proper exercise of Commerce Clause power. Questions about the nature of federalism, and, specifically, just how far the federal government may go into matters of traditionally state
is addressed to those who purposely and intentionally target children. Here, there was no such targeting. As the Sixth Circuit said in rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the statute: "The statute only applies to those who 'knowingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United S
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
"jurisdictional hook," the hook is too weakly connected to the problem (sexual crimes against minors) to sustain the statute as a proper exercise of Commerce Clause power. Questions about the nature of federalism, and, specifically, just how far the federal government may go into matters of traditionally state
is addressed to those who purposely and intentionally target children. Here, there was no such targeting. As the Sixth Circuit said in rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the statute: "The statute only applies to those who `knowingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United S
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
"jurisdictional hook," the hook is too weakly connected to the problem (sexual crimes against minors) to sustain the statute as a proper exercise of Commerce Clause power. Questions about the nature of federalism, and, specifically, just how far the federal government may go into matters of traditionally state
is addressed to those who purposely and intentionally target children. Here, there was no such targeting. As the Sixth Circuit said in rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the statute: "The statute only applies to those who ' owingly' persuade or entice, or attempt If to persuade or entice, minors. Unite
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (586)
Entities connected to both Commerce Clause and First Amendment
George W. Bush
PERSON8 w/ Commerce·12 w/ First
United States
LOCATION10 w/ Commerce·9 w/ First
New York
LOCATION8 w/ Commerce·10 w/ First
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON8 w/ Commerce·10 w/ First
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON7 w/ Commerce·11 w/ First
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ Commerce·11 w/ First
Houston
LOCATION7 w/ Commerce·10 w/ First
O'
O'Connor
PERSON8 w/ Commerce·8 w/ First
Bill Clinton
PERSON7 w/ Commerce·9 w/ First
Thomas Jefferson
PERSON7 w/ Commerce·9 w/ First
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON7 w/ Commerce·9 w/ First
LB
Leon Black
PERSON7 w/ Commerce·9 w/ First
Bailey
PERSON7 w/ Commerce·9 w/ First
Rwanda
LOCATION7 w/ Commerce·8 w/ First
BO
Booker
PERSON8 w/ Commerce·7 w/ First
Harvard University
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Commerce·8 w/ First
MA
Mann Act
PERSON8 w/ Commerce·7 w/ First
Martin Nowak
PERSON8 w/ Commerce·7 w/ First
Steven Pinker
PERSON7 w/ Commerce·8 w/ First
Lawrence Krauss
PERSON8 w/ Commerce·7 w/ First