Epstein Secrets

rs argued that the work-product privilege 5 EFTA00209389 Case: 13-12923 Date Reed H4118/2014 Page: 6 of 23 protects their correspondence; that Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 create a privilege for plea negotiations; and that their correspondence contained confidential grand jury

IN, Intervenors-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting

rs argued that the work-product privilege 5 EFTA00209430 Case: 13-12923 Date Reed H4118/2014 Page: 6 of 23 protects their correspondence; that Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 create a privilege for plea negotiations; and that their correspondence contained confidential grand jury

IN, Intervenors-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting

argued that the work-product privilege 5 EFTA00209636 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 04/18/2014 Page: 6 of 23 protects their correspondence; that Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 create a privilege for plea negotiations; and that their correspondence contained confidential grand jury

IN, Intervenors-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting

argued that the work-product privilege 5 EFTA00209745 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 04/18/2014 Page: 6 of 23 protects their correspondence; that Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 create a privilege for plea negotiations; and that their correspondence contained confidential grand jury

IN, Intervenors-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting

P. 24(b), the intervenors moved for protective orders. The intervenors argued that the work-product priv- ilege protects their correspondence; that Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and Feder- al Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 create a privilege for plea negotiations; and that their correspondence contained confidential grand jur

ellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Flor- ida. D.C. Docket No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM. Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,FN* District Judge. FN* Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitti