Epstein Secrets

From: Paul Cassell <[email protected]> To: Jackie Perczek CIPerczek black.com> "Maria Kelljchian ([email protected])" <[email protected]> Cc: "Brad Edwards ([email protected])" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"

rospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings," DE 207. However, in reviewing the motion, we did not see the statement of Pre-Filing Conference, required by the Court's Local Rules. See Local Rule 7.1(A)(3). This requirement cannot be ignored, and we would like the opportunity to confer wit

From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczek®royblack.com> To: Paul Cassell <cassell law.utah.edu> ow mgw att.ent <[email protected]>, "Maria Kelljchian (maria®pathtojustice.com)" <[email protected]> Cc: "Brad Edwards ([email protected])" <[email protected]>, "Marvin Simeon" <MSimeo

rospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings," DE 207. However, in reviewing the motion, we did not see the statement of Pre-Filing Conference, required by the Court's Local Rules. See Local Rule 7.1(A)(3). This requirement cannot be ignored, and we would like the opportunity to confer wit

recipient or as a "cc" recipient. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:57 PM To: Paul Cassell; Jackie Perczek; Brad Edwards II) Cc: Maria Kelljchian ( (USAFLS); Subject: RE: complete email list Paul, Thank you. From: Paul Cassell [ Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:15 PM Cc: (USAFLS); Maria

rospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings," DE 207. However, in reviewing the motion, we did not see the statement of Pre-Filing Conference, required by the Court's Local Rules. See Local Rule 7.1(A)(3). This requirement cannot be ignored, and we would like the opportunity to confer wit

To: "Paul Cassell ([email protected])" <[email protected]>, "Brad Edwards ([email protected])" Cc Maria Kelljchian" <[email protected]>, "Jackie Perczek ([email protected])" <[email protected]> Subject: FW: complete email list Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2

rospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings," DE 207. However, in reviewing the motion, we did not see the statement of Pre-Filing Conference, required by the Court's Local Rules. See Local Rule 7.1(A)(3). This requirement cannot be ignored, and we would like the opportunity to confer wit