Epstein Secrets

gnated Mr. Epstein as the lower of two levels of sex offender under that state's sex offender registration act. See Letter of Jack A. Goldberger to New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, August 12, 2010 (Exhibit C); see also Fla. Stat. § 775.21 (Florida sexual predator statute), § 943.0435 (Florida sexual offender statute). Even mo

belongs. II. Jeffrey Epstein Poses Little To No Threat Of Reoffending Or Causing Harm To The Public Safety Of The People Of New York A. Risk of Reoffense With respect to the first and primary factor in a SORA assessment, Jeffrey Epstein presents little to no risk of committing further sexual offenses

gnated Mr. Epstein as the lower of two levels of sex offender under that state's sex offender registration act. See Letter of Jack A. Goldberger to New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, August 12, 2010 (Exhibit 3 The nearest cognate crime under New York law in 2005 was Patronizing a Prostitute in the Third Degree, P.L. 230.04, a m

rk and Florida, just barely falls within the range of conduct viewed as sufficiently harmful to trigger SORA registration requirements. B. Risk of Reoffense With respect to the second factor in a SORA assessment, Jeffrey Epstein presents little to no risk of committing further sexual offenses. Indeed, t

nated Mr. Epstein as the lower of two levels of sex offender under that Sstate's sex offender registration act. See Letter of Jack A. Goldberger to New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, August 12, 2010 (Exhibit C); see also Fla. Stat. § 775.21 (Florida sexual predator statute), § 943.0435 (Florida sexual offender statute). Even m

belongs. II. Jeffrey Epstein Poses Little To No Threat Of Reoffending Or Causing Harm To The Public Safety Of The People Of New York A. Risk of Reoffense With respect to the first and primary factor in a SORA assessment, Jeffrey-Mr. Epstein presents little to no risk of committing further sexual offe