Epstein Secrets

x Crimes Unit ADA Jennifer Gaffney, Deputy Chief, Sex Crimes Unit ADA Patrick Egan, Sex Crimes Bureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 7, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 Jeffrey Epstein, a 57-

his SORA designation reflect that fact. B. The Level 3 Calculation by the Board Is Not Supported by Facts or the Law Curiously, the reviewer from the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended that Jeffrey Epstein be designated a Level 3 offender, notwithstanding the absence of any key factors that suggesting that he might pos

x Crimes Unit ADA Jennifer Gaffney, Deputy Chief, Sex Crimes Unit ADA Patrick Egan, Sex Crimes Bureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 8, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 Jeffrey Epstein, a 57-

th to abide by the law unconditionally, and the reasoned determinations of other jurisdictions having greater contact and control over Mr. Epstein, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders in New York has recommended that Mr. Epstein be categorized as a Level 3 sex offender. Such a harsh designation would subject Jeffrey Epstein to a

ennifer Gaffney, Deputy Chief, Sex Crimes Unit ADA Patrick Egan, Sex Crimes Bureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Matthew Solum Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 5, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 New York's Sex Offende

his SORA designation reflect that fact. B. The Level 3 Calculation by the Board Is Not Supported by Facts or the Law Curiously, the reviewer from the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended that Jeffrey Epstein be designated a Level 3 offender, notwithstanding the absence of any key factors that suggesting that he might pos

mes Unit ADA Jennifer Gaffney, Deputy Chief, Sex Crimes Unit ADA Patrick Egan, Sex Crimes Bureau and Trial Bureau 40 FROM Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Sandra Lynn Musumeci DATE October 7, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 Jeffrey Epstein is ;4

& ELLIS LLP demonstrated a commitment to go beyond what is demanded of him to remain in full compliance with the law. Curiously, the reviewer from the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended that Mr. Jeffrey-Epstein be designated a Level 3 offender, notwithstanding the absence of any key factors that even remotely suggesting

program (McAfee Enterprise 8.5 Virus Scan, updated as of March 9, 2009) and, according to the program, are free of viruses. Jay p. efkowitz, P.C. Sandra Lynn Musumeci KIRKIAAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone Facsimile: EFTA00181137 EFTA00181138 . EFTA00181139 EFTA00

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

program (McAfee Enterprise 8.5 Virus Scan, updated as of March 9, 2009) and, according to the program, are free of viruses. Jay PJLefkowitz, P.C. Sandra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: Facsimile: EFTA00231598 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

program (McAfee Enterprise 8.5 Virus Scan, updated as of March 9, 2009) and, according to the program, are free of viruses. Jay P. efkowitz, P.C. Sandra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone; Facsimile: EFTA00232718 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting