Epstein Secrets

HEREBY CERTIFY THAT that I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this 11'" day of February, 2011

eates a duty in the promisor to any intended beneficiary to perform the promise, and the intended beneficiary may enforce the duty." KMART Corp. is Balfour Beatty, ha, 994 F.Supp. 634, 636 (D.V.I. 1998) (quoting Restatement (Second) q/' Contracts § 304). A third party beneficiary is an exception to the privit

ue and correct copy of the foregoing MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ECONSIDERATION OF ORDER ENTERED MAY 24, 2011 to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this r day of -1t.t , 201

nd in place of the contracting party, Molyneux, to enforce their rights under the contract. Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 304; XMART Corp. v. Balfour Beatty, Inc., 994 F.Supp. 634, 637 a. 1998). Molyneux is not a necessary party because Plaintiffs stand in Molyneux's place and by reason of the Confident

y of the foregoing MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER ENTERED ON MAY 24, 2011, to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this Is day of tin rI•P ,

and in place of the contracting party, Molyneux, to enforce their rights under the contract. Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 304; KMART Corp. v. Balfour Beatty, Inc., 994 F.Supp. 634, 637 (D.V.1. 1998). Molyneux is not a necessary party because Plaintiffs stand in Molyneux's place and by reason of the Conf