Epstein Secrets

ry, Epstein did not file any answer or response, even though Epstein had previously filed a detailed Response in Opposition to Bradley Edwards' and Farmer Jaffe's Summaries of Damages for violation of the same order from this Court. See DE 6394. Accordingly, unlike the damages sought by Mr. Edwards which Epste

hile allowing the victims to supplement their summary to respond to the arguments made by Epstein. DE 6427. Thereafter, the victims filed a further Summary of Damages, alleging significant emotional distress. DE 6432. After the victims filed their summary, Epstein did not file any answer or response, even though

onse to S. Rothstein's 4.50 3,375.00 Motion to Dismiss; work on Objection to Duces Tecum in State Court action 06/25/18 TLC Work on Response to Farmer Jaffe's Summary of 6.20 1,395.00 Damages; work on trying to locate recent automobile case J. Scarola tried in order to interview jurors; research Farmer

Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings 06/27/18 SJL Work on Response to B. Edwards' and Farmer 8.20 6,150.00 Jaffe's Summary of Damages; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings; follow up with M. Weinberg and J. Goldberg r

onse to S. Rothstein's 4.50 3,375.00 Motion to Dismiss; work on Objection to Duces Tecum in State Court action 06/25/18 TLC Work on Response to Farmer Jaffe's Summary of 6.20 1,395.00 Damages; work on trying to locate recent automobile case J. Scarola tried In order to interview jurors; research Farmer

Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings 06/27/18 SJL Work on Response to B. Edwards' and Farmer 8.20 6,150.00 Jaffe's Summary of Damages; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings; follow up with M. Weinberg and J. Goldberg r