Epstein Secrets

* Brandt and LE6 AG Ckenlaanch thrtedenlous are not noted by te FDIC Elms held the U3S AG Carr, Branch are hartaCt.trgaPOIOda0 I. ~cm rel. ol to, Cayman hints. and there's no parature or omir enlesicn el LeS AG to repay the balances Mik on the UBS Carman Branch's bods. Pant ~Its re red protected b

8,053 68 -13,486.12 -13,486.12 8.75 8.75 $36,522.63 $36.52243 Dividend and interest income earned Re Outposts c( lbs statement. temblity of Werth and clecttoci krterne has been cluenrenel (Km a us to ItP:enn9 perspective Based tepOo the residence of the Account hOrdel. (Cream? !pt. or pecestxt

SSW, Branch. These deposits are not inured by the FDIC. Balances held at he 1165 AG Cayman Branch are tenwanly ("posed to the sovereign refs of the Cayman blind, end there is nocturne* or whet oblation of 1.85 AG to repay the balances while on the UBS Cayman Branch's books. Bank deposits are not pro

5498. 10425. etc ) when orepamg your lax return. The Fim required by law to ran to he IRS alltaxable dividends, wportabb rontisubk anima and mute Werth end an etuties held n you accota, net proceeds the btheaclions, rd con basisoncertain covered caries. CwvareaslatIons with the Firm • Please rec

ity, and do not face any different 'species' of immunity—e.g., an express agreement not to prosecute for future tax violations with respect to the Cayman Is- lands." Supra at 1446 n. 10. Indeed as I read the majority opinion, its holding that Harvey's immunity is only as broad as the fifth amendment

suit The principal claims are for injunctive and de- claratory relief; such equitable relief is particularly suited for group representa- tion. See Werth, 422 U.S. at 516, 96 S.Ct. at 2213. Thus, we conclude that the orga- nizations have standing. IV 17, 8) Although a case may not be moot, a plaint