Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ
g information of BOP employees under Exemption 7(F). See Jordan, 668 F.3d at 1198 (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP Supermax roster); Pinson v. Dep 't opustice, 236 F. Supp. 3d 388, 370 (D.D.C. 2017) (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP assignment rosters). IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its D
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ
g information of BOP employees under Exemption 7(F). See Jordan, 668 F.3d at 1198 (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP Supermax roster); Pinson v. Dep 't opustice, 236 F. Supp. 3d 388, 370 (D.D.C. 2017) (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP assignment rosters). IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its D
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ
g information of BOP employees under Exemption 7(F). See Jordan, 668 F.3d at 1198 (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP Supermax roster); Pinson v. Dep 't opustice, 236 F. Supp. 3d 388, 370 (D.D.C. 2017) (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP assignment rosters). IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its D
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (116)
Entities connected to both the Tenth Circuit's and Pinson v. Dep '
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON12 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
United States
LOCATION10 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
NT
Nicholas Tartaglione
PERSON8 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
Audrey Strauss
PERSON8 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY
ORGANIZATION8 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
the Southern District
LOCATION8 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
TN
Tova Noel
PERSON8 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
CH
Christenson
PERSON7 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON7 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
Hopkins
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
D.C. Cir
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
Homeland Sec
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
Human Rights Watch
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
RA
Radcliffe
PERSON6 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
Doherty
PERSON6 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
The New York Times
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
FA
Favish
PERSON6 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
GA
Garcia
PERSON6 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
Judicial Watch, Inc.
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson
the Acting United States
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·3 w/ Pinson